CVPR2021投稿流程

After receiving the reviews, authors may optionally submit a rebuttal to address the reviewers' comments, which will be limited to a one page PDF file using the "CVPR 2021 Rebuttal Template".

The rebuttal must maintain anonymity and cannot include external links that reveal the author identity or circumvent the length restriction.

Responses longer than one page will simply not be reviewed. This includes responses where the margins and formatting are deemed to have been significantly altered from those specified by the style guide.

The author rebuttal is optional and is meant to provide you with an opportunity to rebut factual errors or to supply additional information requested by the reviewers. It is NOT intended to add new contributions (theorems, algorithms, experiments) that were absent in the original submission and NOT specifically requested by the reviewers. You may optionally add a figure, graph or proof to your rebuttal to better illustrate your answer to the reviewers' comments.

Per a passed 2018 PAMI-TC motion, reviewers should not request additional experiments for the rebuttal, or penalize authors for lack of additional experiments. This includes any experiments that involve running code, e.g., to create tables or figures with new results. Examples of such experiments are ablation studies, new baseline results (unless already reported elsewhere), results with additional hyperparameters, or results on new datasets. Authors should not include new experimental results in the rebuttal, and reviewers should discount any such results when making their final recommendation. These also include experiments that were run by authors before the submission deadline but were not included either in the paper or the supplementary material.

Should any evidence of new experiments be found in the rebuttal, the reviewers and Area Chairs have the right to disregard the entire rebuttal. We will encourage ACs/reviewers to ignore rather than penalize additional results if they are reported by authors. ACs are expected to monitor reviewers to make sure authors are not penalized for lack of additional results, even if reviewers asked for them.

反驳指示 在收到评论后，作者可以选择提交一份反驳意见，以解决评审员的意见，该文件将限于使用“CVPR 2021反驳模板”的一页PDF文件。 反驳必须保持匿名性，不能包含暴露作者身份或绕过长度限制的外部链接。 超过一页的回复将不会被审查。这包括页边距和格式被认为与样式指南中指定的内容有很大不同的响应。 作者反驳是可选的，旨在为您提供反驳事实错误或提供审稿人要求的附加信息的机会。它不打算增加新的贡献（定理，算法，实验）在最初的提交中没有，也没有特别要求的评论者。你可以选择在你的反驳中添加一个数字、图表或证据，以便更好地说明你对评论者评论的回答。 根据已通过的2018年PAMI-TC动议，审稿人不应要求额外的实验来反驳，也不应因缺少额外实验而惩罚作者。这包括任何涉及运行代码的实验，例如，创建具有新结果的表格或图形。这类实验的例子包括消融研究、新的基线结果（除非已经在别处报道过）、具有额外超参数的结果，或者是新数据集的结果。作者不应在反驳中包括新的实验结果，而评论者在提出最终建议时，应不考虑任何此类结果。这些还包括作者在提交截止日期前进行的实验，但在论文或补充材料中都没有包含。 如果在反驳中发现任何新实验的证据，评审员和地区主席有权忽略整个反驳。如果作者报告了额外的结果，我们将鼓励ACs/审查者忽略而不是惩罚他们。ACs被期望监视评论者，以确保作者不会因为缺少额外的结果而受到惩罚，即使审稿人要求这样做。