ARM Cortex 您所在的位置:网站首页 a55对比a73 ARM Cortex

ARM Cortex

2023-08-21 22:44| 来源: 网络整理| 查看: 265

Home page      Processor      Comparison ARM Cortex-A73 vs ARM Cortex-A55 ARM Cortex-A73 on Amazon USA ARM Cortex-A55 on Amazon USA

Compare the technical characteristics between the group of processors ARM Cortex-A73 and the group of processors ARM Cortex-A55, but also with the respective performance in the benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison: Unisoc UIS8581A 2018 Q4 28 nm HPC+ 4 4 1.2 1.6 0.256 3 3 74462 1507 827 3316 143 677 Unisoc UIS8581 2018 Q4 28 nm HPC+ 4 4 1.2 1.6 0.256 3 3 74462 1519 817 3343 151 686 Unisoc SC9863A1 2023 Q1 28 nm HPC+ 4 4 1.2 1.6 0.256 3 3 98942 125 469 Unisoc SC9863A 2018 Q4 28 nm HPC+ 4 4 1.2 1.6 0.256 3 3 93118 1516 815 3338 141 616 Unisoc SC9863 2019 Q1 28 nm HPC+ 4 4 1.2 1.6 0.256 3 3 63161 1818 818 3365 147 727 Samsung Exynos 850 2020 Q2 8 nm LPP 8 8 2 2 2 8 7 124990 1729 970 4656 166 901 Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 2019 Q3 10 nm LPE 8 8 1.7 2.3 2 6 8 180283 1958 1645 5303 327 1230 Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 2018 Q4 10 nm LPE 8 8 1.6 2.3 2 6 8 146360 2009 1659 5309 Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 2019 Q2 10 nm LPE 8 8 1.6 2.2 2 6 9 172696 2076 1601 5365 Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 2019 Q1 14 nm FinFET 8 8 1.6 1.8 2 8 5 109450 1725 1280 3998 263 943 Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 2018 Q1 14 nm LPP 8 8 1.6 2.2 2 6 8 116370 2521 1382 3960 280 969 Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B 2019 Q2 14 nm FinFET 8 8 1.35 1.6 2 3 5 136868 1416 1215 3941 302 1134 Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 2018 Q1 14 nm FinFET 8 8 1.35 1.6 2 3 5 95273 665 1089 3422 Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 2017 Q1 14 nm LPP 8 8 1.5 2 2 3 4 59173 1186 771 4052 Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 2018 Q1 14 nm LPP 6 6 1.6 2 2 3 5 93560 1311 3121 282 768 Rockchip RK3568B2 2022 Q1 22 nm 4 4 2 2 0.512 8 1 5 123 433 Rockchip RK3568 2020 Q2 22 nm 4 4 2 2 0.256 8 1 5 115027 1186 875 2375 161 492 Rockchip RK3566 2020 Q2 22 nm 4 4 1.8 1.8 0.256 4 1 5 61026 756 1997 108 281 Rockchip RK3356 2021 Q1 22 nm 4 4 1.8 1.8 1 8 4 5 82023 736 1806 143 419 Realtek RTD2873 2019 Q1 12 nm 4 4 1.6 1.6 1 2 1 13 557 1420 88 268 Realtek RTD2851 2019 Q1 12 nm 4 4 1.1 1.1 1 2 1 13 507 1232 71 184 Realtek RTD1619DR 2020 Q4 12 nm 6 6 1.3 1.3 1 4 1 5 45876 637 2230 106 361 Realtek RTD1619B 2023 Q1 12 nm 4 4 1.1 1.7 1 4 1 5 Realtek RTD1619 2020 Q4 12 nm 6 6 1.3 1.3 1 4 1 5 45853 638 2226 105 362 Realtek RTD1319C 2022 Q3 12 nm 4 4 1.4 1.4 1 4 1 5 81537 127 460 Realtek RTD1319 2020 Q3 12 nm 4 4 1.4 1.4 1 4 1 5 75511 742 2067 119 426 Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 2017 Q2 10 nm FinFET LPE 8 8 1.9 2.45 2 6 9 199273 1213 1855 6324 374 1464 MediaTek S900 2019 Q3 28 nm HPM 4 4 1.8 1.8 1 8.5 5 642 834 1278 3304 206 596 MediaTek Pentonic 700 2022 Q3 7 nm FinFET 4 4 1.4 1.4 1 16 5 MediaTek Pentonic 1000 2022 Q4 7 nm FinFET 4 4 2 2 1 16 5 MediaTek MT9950 2019 Q3 28 nm HPM 4 4 1.8 1.8 1 8.5 5 639 837 1267 3262 203 598 MediaTek MT9900 2022 Q2 28 nm HPM 4 4 1.8 1.8 1 8.5 5 1065 2926 219 635 MediaTek MT9685 2021 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1.5 1.5 1 2 5 MediaTek MT9652 2021 Q2 28 nm HPM 4 4 1.4 1.4 1 2 5 999 2441 167 646 MediaTek MT9615 2021 Q2 28 nm HPM 4 4 1.6 1.6 1 2 5 952 2407 158 523 MediaTek MT9612 2021 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1.5 1.5 1 2 5 634 1549 106 410 MediaTek MT9611 2021 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1.5 1.5 1 2 5 MediaTek MT8788V 2021 Q4 12 nm 8 8 2 2 2 8 5 91598 766 1387 5326 281 1315 MediaTek MT8788A 2019 Q2 12 nm 8 8 2 2 2 8 5 124809 812 1399 5343 296 1364 MediaTek MT8788 2019 Q2 12 nm 8 8 2 2 2 8 5 119998 778 1398 5315 284 1306 MediaTek MT8183V 2021 Q1 12 nm 8 8 2 2 1 4 10 161374 2140 1365 5140 288 1248 MediaTek MT8183C 2020 Q4 12 nm 8 8 1.6 2 1 4 10 1395 5055 261 908 MediaTek MT8183 2019 Q4 12 nm 8 8 1.6 2 1 4 10 1397 4863 286 1344 MediaTek MT8169A 2022 Q4 12 nm 6 6 2 2 1 4 2 135441 1847 889 3575 176 803 MediaTek MT6799 Helio X30 2017 Q2 10 nm FF 10 10 1.9 2.6 2 8 5 107127 1638 1777 5761 249 1089 MediaTek MT6771V/WM Helio P60 2019 Q1 12 nm FFC 8 8 2 2 2 8 5 147775 2180 1327 5123 293 1265 MediaTek MT6771V/W Helio P60 2019 Q1 12 nm FFC 8 8 2 2 2 8 5 169080 1817 1447 5144 293 1265 MediaTek MT6771V/C Helio P60 2019 Q1 12 nm FFC 8 8 2 2 2 8 5 206372 2583 1315 5055 292 1359 MediaTek MT6771V Helio P70 2019 Q4 12 nm HPM 8 8 2 2.1 2 8 5 174038 2380 1497 5455 297 1406 MediaTek MT6771T Helio P70 2018 Q4 12 nm HPM 8 8 2 2.1 2 8 5 134000 2608 1431 5624 MediaTek MT6771 Helio P70M 2019 Q4 12 nm HPM 8 8 2 2.1 2 8 5 147520 1098 1437 5352 308 1395 MediaTek MT5895 2020 Q3 28 nm HPM 4 4 1.8 1.8 1 8.5 5 1174 3046 214 554 MediaTek MT5893 2020 Q3 28 nm HPM 4 4 1 1.5 1 4 5 1048 2690 193 565 LG α9 Intelligent Processor 4K 2018 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1 1 1 3 5 LG α9 Gen4 AI Processor 8K 2021 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1.8 1.8 1 3 5 634 841 1258 3273 205 603 LG α9 Gen4 AI Processor 4K 2021 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1 1 1 3 5 LG α9 Gen3 AI Processor 8K 2020 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1.8 1.8 1 3 5 LG α9 Gen3 AI Processor 4K 2020 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1 1 1 3 5 LG α9 Gen2 Intelligent Processor 8K 2019 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1.8 1.8 1 3 5 LG α9 Gen2 Intelligent Processor 4K 2019 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1 1 1 3 5 LG α7 Intelligent Processor 4K 2018 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1 1 1 2 5 LG α7 Gen5 AI Processor 4K 2022 Q1 7 nm FinFET 4 4 1 1 1 2 5 LG α7 Gen4 AI Processor 4K 2021 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1 1 1 2 5 LG α7 Gen3 AI Processor 4K 2020 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1 1 1 2 5 LG α7 Gen2 Intelligent Processor 4K 2019 Q1 28 nm HPM 4 4 1 1 1 2 5 HiSilicon Kirin 970 2017 Q3 10 nm FinFET+ 8 8 1.84 2.36 2 8 9 205987 2220 1890 6648 357 1497 HiSilicon Kirin 960S 2016 Q4 16 nm FFC 8 8 1.84 2.4 4 6 5 166768 2726 1578 5737 328 1457 HiSilicon Kirin 960 2016 Q4 16 nm FFC 8 8 1.84 2.36 4 6 5 170500 2384 1846 6174 328 1294 HiSilicon Kirin 710F 2018 Q3 12 nm FinFET 8 8 1.7 2.2 8 5 176140 2475 1576 5445 335 1328 HiSilicon Kirin 710A 2020 Q2 14 nm FinFET 8 8 1.7 2 8 5 167460 2112 1431 5310 298 1301 HiSilicon Kirin 710 2018 Q3 12 nm FinFET 8 8 1.7 2.2 6 5 139430 2353 1595 5516 322 1212 Amlogic T982 2022 Q3 12 nm FinFET 4 4 1.8 1.8 0.512 4 1 5 Amlogic T972 2021 Q4 12 nm 4 4 1.98 1.98 0.512 4 1 5 122 325 Amlogic S922Z 2019 Q4 12 nm 6 6 1.8 2.2 1 4 1 5 133273 1422 3955 280 928 Amlogic S908X 2020 Q3 12 nm 4 4 1.9 1.9 1 2 1 5 53256 876 2333 148 396 Amlogic S905X4-K 2022 Q3 12 nm 4 4 2 2 1 4 1 5 88576 576 836 2082 145 459 Amlogic S905X4-B 2021 Q3 12 nm 4 4 1.2 2 1 4 1 5 89425 654 839 2448 146 518 Amlogic S905X4 2021 Q1 12 nm 4 4 1.91 1.91 1 4 1 5 101519 576 769 2154 129 424 Amlogic S905X3-B 2020 Q3 12 nm 4 4 1.5 2 1 4 1 5 69412 414 782 2112 131 439 Amlogic S905X3 2019 Q4 12 nm 4 4 1.91 1.91 1 4 1 5 74472 414 773 2128 132 458 Amlogic S905D3G 2020 Q3 12 nm 4 4 1.9 1.9 1 2 1 5 70562 481 902 2433 141 485 Amlogic S905D3 2019 Q4 12 nm 4 4 1.91 1.91 1 2 1 5 70583 483 913 2424 138 478 Amlogic POP1-G 2022 Q3 12 nm 8 8 2 2.2 2 2 1 5 167386 1625 4945 276 685 Amlogic A311D2 2021 Q4 12 nm 8 8 2 2.3 2 16 1 5 1524 5410 285 991 Amlogic A311D 2019 Q2 12 nm 6 6 1.8 2.2 1 4 1 5 131560 1359 3688 289 933

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

This comparative table allows us to better appreciate the differences between the various processors. The performance for Geekbench single-core and multi-core are established by default on the Windows operating system, on Linux if there is at least one server processor present in the comparison, on Mac OS X if we make a parallel with at least one Apple branded processor on Linux and Android if a smartphone processor other than Apple is present.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks: AnTuTu - Total score MediaTek MT6771V/C Helio P60 206,372 HiSilicon Kirin 970 205,987 Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 199,273 Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 180,283 HiSilicon Kirin 710F 176,140 MediaTek MT6771V Helio P70 174,038 Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 172,696 HiSilicon Kirin 960 170,500 MediaTek MT6771V/W Helio P60 169,080 HiSilicon Kirin 710A 167,460 MediaTek MT8169A 135,441 Samsung Exynos 850 124,990 Rockchip RK3568 115,027 Amlogic S905X4 101,519 Unisoc SC9863A1 98,942 Unisoc SC9863A 93,118 Amlogic S905X4-B 89,425 Amlogic S905X4-K 88,576 Rockchip RK3356 82,023 Realtek RTD1319C 81,537

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread LG α9 Gen4 AI Processor 8K 634 841 MediaTek MT9950 639 837 MediaTek S900 642 834

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results. Android PassMark - CPU Mark HiSilicon Kirin 960S 2,726 MediaTek MT6771T Helio P70 2,608 MediaTek MT6771V/C Helio P60 2,583 Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 2,521 HiSilicon Kirin 710F 2,475 HiSilicon Kirin 960 2,384 MediaTek MT6771V Helio P70 2,380 HiSilicon Kirin 710 2,353 HiSilicon Kirin 970 2,220 MediaTek MT6771V/WM Helio P60 2,180 MediaTek MT8169A 1,847 Unisoc SC9863 1,818 Samsung Exynos 850 1,729 Unisoc UIS8581 1,519 Unisoc SC9863A 1,516 Unisoc UIS8581A 1,507 Rockchip RK3568 1,186 Amlogic S905X4-B 654 Amlogic S905X4-K 576 Amlogic S905X4 576

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score HiSilicon Kirin 970 1,890 6,648 Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 1,855 6,324 HiSilicon Kirin 960 1,846 6,174 MediaTek MT6799 Helio X30 1,777 5,761 HiSilicon Kirin 960S 1,578 5,737 MediaTek MT6771T Helio P70 1,431 5,624 HiSilicon Kirin 710 1,595 5,516 MediaTek MT6771V Helio P70 1,497 5,455 HiSilicon Kirin 710F 1,576 5,445 Amlogic A311D2 1,524 5,410 Samsung Exynos 850 970 4,656 MediaTek MT8169A 889 3,575 Unisoc SC9863 818 3,365 Unisoc UIS8581 817 3,343 Unisoc SC9863A 815 3,338 Unisoc UIS8581A 827 3,316 Amlogic S905X4-B 839 2,448 Amlogic S905D3G 902 2,433 Amlogic S905D3 913 2,424 Rockchip RK3568 875 2,375

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score HiSilicon Kirin 970 357 1,497 Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 374 1,464 HiSilicon Kirin 960S 328 1,457 MediaTek MT6771V Helio P70 297 1,406 MediaTek MT6771 Helio P70M 308 1,395 MediaTek MT8788A 296 1,364 MediaTek MT6771V/C Helio P60 292 1,359 MediaTek MT8183 286 1,344 HiSilicon Kirin 710F 335 1,328 MediaTek MT8788V 281 1,315 Samsung Exynos 850 166 901 MediaTek MT8169A 176 803 Unisoc SC9863 147 727 Unisoc UIS8581 151 686 Unisoc UIS8581A 143 677 Unisoc SC9863A 141 616 Amlogic S905X4-B 146 518 Rockchip RK3568 161 492 Amlogic S905D3G 141 485 Amlogic S905D3 138 478

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

See also:ARM Cortex-A7ARM Cortex-A72ARM Cortex-A75ARM Cortex-A76ARM Cortex-A77ARM Cortex-A78

ARM Cortex-A5ARM Cortex-A53ARM Cortex-A57

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland


【本文地址】

公司简介

联系我们

今日新闻

    推荐新闻

    专题文章
      CopyRight 2018-2019 实验室设备网 版权所有