张琳

您所在的位置:网站首页 武汉大学张亮教授 张琳

张琳

2024-07-01 07:01:58| 来源: 网络整理| 查看: 265

学术成果

部分代表性期刊论文:

[1] Lin Zhang*, Zhenyu Gou, Zhichao Fang, Gunnar Sivertsen, Ying Huang. Who tweets scientific publications? A large-scale study of tweeting audiences in all areas of research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2023, http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24830.

[2] Ying Huang, Xiaoting Liu, Ruinan Li, Lin Zhang. The science of team science (SciTS): An emerging and evolving field of interdisciplinary collaboration. Profesional De La información, 2023, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.mar.04.

[3] Ruinan Li, Raf Guns, Tim C. E. Engels, Lin Zhang, Ying Huang. Tracking the featured topics of the International Science of Team Science conference series and their evolution during 2010–2019. Scientometrics, 2023, 128, 2447–2469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04651-3.

[4] Si Shen, Jiangfeng Liu, Litao Lin, Ying Huang, Lin Zhang, Chang Liu, Yutong Feng, Dongbo Wang. SsciBERT: a pre-trained language model for social science texts. Scientometrics, 2023, 128, 1241–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04602-4.

[5] Ying Huang, Yashan Li, Jinge Mao, Ruinan Li, Lin Zhang*. The dynamics of policy coordination: The case of China’s science and technology policy-making. Science and Public Policy, 2023, 50(2): 177-193 https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac058.

[6] Ronald Rousseau, Lin Zhang*, Gunnar Sivertsen. Using the weighted Lorenz curve to represent balance in collaborations: the BIC indicator. Scientometrics, 2023, 128, 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04533-0.

[7] Lin Zhang, Fan Qi, Ying Huang, Bart Van Looy, Lixin Chen, Ozcan Saritas. Chinese public university patents during 2006-2020: a comprehensive investigation and comparative study. Science and Public Policy, 2023, 50(3), 416-32.

[8] Loet Leydesdorff, Lin Zhang, Paul Wouters. Trajectories and regimes in research versus knowledge evaluations: Contributions to an evolutionary theory of citation. Profesional De La información, 2022, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.ene.03.

[9] Wenjing Zhao, Lili Wang, Lin Zhang*. How does academia respond to the burden of infectious and parasitic disease?. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2022, 20, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00889-0.

[10] Lin Zhang, Mengting Sun, Yujie Peng, Wenjing Zhao, Lixin Chen, Ying Huang*. How public investment fuels innovation: Clues from government-subsidized USPTO patents. Journal of Informetrics, 2022, 16(3): e101313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101313.

[11] Lin Zhang*, Yahui Wei, Ying Huang, Gunnar Sivertsen. Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research. Scientometrics, 2022, 127, 7653–7679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04407-5.

[12] Lin Zhang*, Yahui Wei, Gunnar Sivertsen, Ying Huang. The motivations and criteria behind China's list of questionable journals.Learned Publishing, 2022,https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1456.

[13] Wenjing Zhao,Lin Zhang*, Junling Wang, Lili Wang.How has academia responded to the urgent needs created by COVID-19? A multi-level global, regional and national analysis.Journal of Information Science, 2022,https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221084646.

[14] Ying Huang, Ruinan Li, Fang Zou, Lidan Jiang, Alan L. Porter,Lin Zhang*.Technology life cycle analysis: From the dynamic perspective of patent citation networks.Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 2022

[15] Yuanyuan Shang, Gunnar Sivertsen, Zhe Cao,Lin Zhang*.Gender differences among first authors in research focused on the Sustainable Development Goal of Gender Equality.Scientometrics, 2022

[16] Lin Zhang*, Beibei Sun, Fei Shu, Ying Huang. Comparing paper level classifications across different methods and systems: an investigation of Nature publications,Scientometrics, 2022,https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04352-3.

[17] Lin Zhang*, Yuanyuan Shang, Ying Huang, Gunnar Sivertsen. Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on publons.Scientometrics, 2022, 127: 145-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04209-1.

[18] Yashan Li, Jinge Mao, Lin Zhang*, Dongbo Wang, Si Shen, Ying Huang. How scientific research incorporates policy: an examination using the case of China’s science and technology evaluation system, Scientometrics, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04215-3.

[19] Caroline S. Wagner,Lin Zhang, Loet Leydesdorff. A discussion of measuring the top-1% most-highly cited publications: quality and impact of Chinese papers.Scientometrics, 2022, 127(4): 1825-1839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04291-z.

[20] Lin Zhang*, Loet Leydesdorff*. The scientometric measurement of interdisciplinarity and diversity in the research portfolios of Chinese Universities.Journal of Data and Information Science, 2021, 6(4): 13-35.

[21] Lin Zhang, Yuanyuan Shang, Ying Huang*, Gunnar Sivertsen. Toward internationalization: A bibliometric analysis of the social sciences in Mainland China from 1979 to 2018.Quantitative Science Studies, 2021, 2(1): 376-408.

[22] Ying Huang, Ruinan Li, Lin Zhang*, Gunnar Sivertsen. A comprehensive analysis of the journal evaluation system in China.Quantitative Science Studies, 2021, 2(1): 300-326. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00103.

[23] Lin Zhang, Beibei Sun, Lidan Jiang, Ying Huang.On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects on academic and broader impact,Research Evaluation, 2021,30(3): 256-268.https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab007.

[24] Lin Zhang*, Gunnar Sivertsen, Huiying Du, Ying Huang, Wolfgang Glänzel. Gender differences in the aims and impacts of research.Scientometrics, 2021, 126: 8861-8886.

[25] Ying Huang,Wolfgang Glänzel,Lin Zhang*.Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains.Scientometrics, 2021, 126: 6201-6224.

[26] Ronald Rousseau,Lin Zhang*. Bilateral co-authorship indicators based on fractional counting.Journal of data and information science, 2021, 6(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0005.

[27] Loet Leydesdorff, Caroline S. Wagner,Lin Zhang*. Are university rankings statistically significant? A comparison among Chinese universities and with the USA.Journal of data and information science, 2021, 6(2):67-95. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0014

[28] Lin Zhang, Wenjing Zhao, Beibei Sun, Ying Huang,Wolfgang Glänzel. How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies: A global analysis of response patterns.Scientometrics, 2020,124(1): 747-773.

[29] Ying Huang, Lixin Chen,Lin Zhang*, Patent citation inflation: The phenomenon, its measurement, and relative indicators to temper its effects.Journal of Informetrics, 2020, 14(2): 101015.

[30] Lin Zhang, Wenjing Zhao, Jianhua Liu, Gunnar Sivertsen, Ying Huang. Do national funding organizations properly address the diseases with the highest burden?—Observations from China and the UK.Scientometrics, 2020, 125(2): 1733-1761.

[31] Lin Zhang, Gunnar Sivertsen. The new research assessment reform in China and its implementation.Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020. DOI:10.31235/osf.io/9mqzd.

[32] Gunnar Sivertsen, Ronald Rousseau,Lin Zhang*. Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting.Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13(2): 679-694.

[33] Fei Shu, Charles-Antoine Julien,Lin Zhang, Junping Qiu, Jing Zhang, Vincent Larivière. Comparing journal and paper level classifications of science.Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13(1): 202-225.

[34] Lin Zhang*, Beibei Sun, Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Lixin Chen, Ying Huang*. Interdisciplinarity and collaboration: On the relationship between disciplinary diversity in departmental affiliations and reference lists.Scientometrics, 2018, 117(1): 271-291.

[35] Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo,Lin Zhang*. A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output: the disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list.Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12(4):1182-1193.

[36] Wolfgang Glänzel,Lin Zhang. Scientometric research assessment in the developing world: A tribute to Michael J. Moravcsik from the perspective of the twenty-first century.Scientometrics, 2018, 115(3): 1517-1532.

[37] Lin Zhang*, Wolfgang Glänzel. A citation-based cross-disciplinary study on literature aging: part I--the synchronous approach.Scientometrics, 2017, 111(3): 1573-1589.

[38] Lin Zhang*, Wolfgang Glänzel. A citation-based cross-disciplinary study on literature ageing: part II--diachronous aspects.Scientometrics, 2017, 111(3): 1559-1572.

[39] Lin Zhang*, Ronald Rousseau, Gunnar Sivertsen. Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation.PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(3): e0174205.

[40] Lin Zhang*, Ronald Rousseau, Wolfgang Glänzel.Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(5): 1257-1265.

[41] Lin Zhang*, Wolfgang Glänzel, Fred, Y.Ye*.The Dynamic evolution of core documents: an experimental study based on h-related literature (2005–2013).Scientometrics, 2016, 106(1): 369-381.

[42] Jurrien Bakker, Dennis Verhoeven, Lin Zhang. Patent citation indicators: One size fits all?Scientometrics, 2016, 106(1): 187-211.

[43] Bart Thijs, Lin Zhang, Wolfgang Glänzel.Bibliographic coupling and hierarchical clustering for the validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes.Scientometrics, 2015, 105(3): 1453-1467.

[44] Lin Zhang*, Bart Thijs, Wolfgang Glänzel.What does scientometrics share with other “metrics” sciences?Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(7): 1515-1518.

[45] XueLi Liu, Meiying Wang,Lin Zhang, Pu Wang, Zhixin Zhou.Journal impact factor: is it only used in China and South Asia?Current Science, 2013: 1480-1484.

[46] Lin Zhang*, Wolfgang Glänzel. Proceeding papers in journals versus the “regular” journal publications.Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6(1): 88-96.

[47] Lin Zhang*, Wolfgang Glänzel. Where demographics meets scientometrics: Towards a dynamic career analysis.Scientometrics, 2012, 91(2): 617-630.

[48] Lin Zhang*. A tapered diffusion impact indicator: A preliminary exploration on the journal level.Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 2012, 17(3): 67-72.

[49] Wolfgang Glänzel, Ronald Rousseau,Lin Zhang.A visual representation of relative first-citation times.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(7): 1420-1425.

[50] Lin Zhang*, Bart Thijs, Wolfgang Glänzel.The diffusion of H-related literature.Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5(4): 583-593.

[51] Lin Zhang*, Ronald Rousseau, Wolfgang Glänzel.Document-type country profiles.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(7): 1403-1411.

[52] Lin Zhang, Xinhai Liu, Frizo Janssens, Liming Liang, Wolfgang Glänzel.Subject clustering analysis based on ISI category classification.Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4(2): 185-193.

[53] Lin Zhang, Frizo Janssens, Liming Liang, Wolfgang Glänzel.Journal cross-citation analysis for validation and improvement of journal-based subject classification in bibliometric research.Scientometrics, 2010, 82(3): 687-706.

[54] Lin Zhang, Wolfgang Glänzel, Liming Liang.Tracing the role of individual journals in a cross-citation network based on different indicators.Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3): 821.DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-2245-y.

[55] Frizo Janssens,Lin Zhang, Wolfgang Glänzel.Hybrid clustering for validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes.Information Processing & Management, 2009, 45(6): 683-702.

[56] Ronald Rousseau,Lin Zhang. Betweenness centrality and Q-measures in directed valued networks.Scientometrics, 2008, 75(3): 575-590.

[57] 尚媛媛,张琳*,曹喆,黄颖.科研人员研究领域变动的三维特征:基于NSFC项目负责人的实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2023,67(16):64-75.

[58] 张琳,韩钰馨.破除“唯论文”后的科研评价改革探索——国外高校科研评价的实践与启示[J].世界社会科学,2023(03):136-154+245.

[59] 张琳*,孙梦婷,黄颖.“跨学科悖论”:概念界定、内涵分析及应对策略[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2023,44(02):3-18.

[60] 吕琦,上官燕红,张琳,黄颖*.基于文本内容自动分类的跨学科测度研究[J].数据分析与知识发现,2023,7(04):56-67.

[61] 黄颖,李瑞婻,刘晓婷,张琳*.科研团队学:内涵、进展与展望.图书情报工作, 2022, 66(04): 45-55.

[62] 尚媛媛,张琳*,曹喆,赵文静,黄颖.高水平综合性学术期刊论文科研合作特征与影响力研究——以中美发表的Nature、Science论文为例.现代情报, 2022, 42(02): 163-177.

[63] 黄颖,顾秀丽,孙蓓蓓,张琳*.我国交叉科学研究的演进与展望——基于学术著作视角.图书情报知识, 2022, 39(01): 61-72.

[64] 赵文静,张琳*,尚媛媛,黄颖.国际公共卫生紧急事件下中美科学合作模式比较分析.图书情报工作, 2021, 65(18): 58-70.

[65] 尚媛媛,曹喆,张琳*,黄颖.中国“顶刊热”的冷思考:基于40年研究主题的多层次国际比较研究.中国科技期刊研究, 2021, 32(08): 945-956.

[66] 张琳,彭玉杰,杜会英,黄颖.技术会聚:内涵、现状与测度——兼论与学科交叉的关系.图书情报工作, 2021, 65(01): 91-101.

[67] 苏鹏,张琳*.学术代表作时间周期、首发载体及题材类型特征研究——以图灵奖为例.图书情报知识, 2021, (01): 66-75.

[68] 张琳,杜会英,尚媛媛,黄颖.性别视角下国家自然科学基金项目负责人的成果产出与影响研究.信息资源管理学报,2021, 11(3): 110-120.

[69] 张琳,孙蓓蓓,王贤文,黄颖.交叉科学成果影响力研究:使用数据与引用数据视角.情报学报, 2020, 39(5): 469-477.

[70] 张琳, Gunnar Sivertsen.科学计量与同行评议相结合的科研评价——国际经验与启示.情报学报, 2020,39(8): 806-816.

[71] 张琳,孙蓓蓓,黄颖.交叉科学研究:内涵、测度与影响.科研管理, 2020, 41(07): 279-288.

[72] 张琳,孙梦婷,顾秀丽,黄颖.交叉学科设置与评价探讨.大学与学科,2020, 1(2):86-101.

[73] 张琳,刘冬东,吕琦,孙蓓蓓,黄颖.论文学科交叉测度研究:从全部引文到章节引文.情报学报, 2020, 39(5): 492-499.

[74] 顾秀丽,黄颖,孙蓓蓓,张琳*.图书情报领域中的交叉科学研究:进展与展望.情报学报, 2020, 39(5): 478-491.

[75] 张琳,彭玉杰,杜会英,黄颖.技术会聚:内涵、现状与测度——兼论与学科交叉的关系.图书情报工作, 2020.

[76] 付慧真,张琳,胡志刚,侯剑华,李江.基础理论视角下的科研评价思考.情报资料工作, 2020, 41(2): 31-37.

[77] 黄颖,张琳*,孙蓓蓓,王志楠,朱东华.跨学科的三维测度:外部知识融合、内在知识会聚与科学合作模式,科学学研究,2019, 37(1):16-26.

[78] 张琳,孙蓓蓓,黄颖.跨学科合作模式下的交叉科学测度研究——以ESI社会科学领域高被引学者为例.情报学报, 2018, 37(3): 231-242.

学术成果 · 学术著作和英文书稿章节:

[1] 张琳,黄颖.交叉科学:测度、评价与应用.北京:科学出版社. 2019.

[2] Ronald Rousseau,Lin Zhang, Xiaojun Hu. Knowledge Integration: its meaning and measurement. In W. Glänzel, H. Moed, U. Schmoch, & M. Thelwall (Eds.),Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Berlin, Heidelberg, etc.: Springer. 2019.

[3] Lin Zhang, Mengting Sun, Ying Huang, Gunnar Sivertsen. Assessment of social sciences in China. In Tim C.E.Engels & Emanuel Kulczycki (Eds.),Handbook on research assessment in social sciences. UK, Edward Elgar. 2021.

[4] Ying Huang, Ruinan Li, Xiaoting Liu,Lin Zhang*. The journal evaluation systems of social sciences in China. In Tim C.E.Engels & Emanuel Kulczycki (Eds.),Handbook on research assessment in social sciences. UK, Edward Elgar. 2021.

学术成果 · 主持的国家级和省部级科研项目:

[1] 从测度到理解:跨学科研究的成果分类、合作模式与影响扩散研究. 国家自然科学基金面上项目(72374160). 2024-2027, 主持.

[2] 科学基金对基础研究发展的贡献识别与监测体系研究. 国家自然科学基金专项项目(L2224005). 2023-2024, 主持.

[3] 科研人员职业生涯的性别差异和影响机理研究:合作、流动与学术表现.国家自然科学基金面上项目(71974150),2020-2023,主持.

[4] 交叉科学的三维测度:内在知识基础、外在信息链接和科学活动模式,国家自然科学基金面上项目(71573085),2016-2019,主持.

[5] 基于大数据的科教评价信息云平台构建和智能服务研究.国家社会科学基金重大项目,2020-2023,子课题负责人.

[6] 基于混合聚类技术的交叉学科结构特征和演进趋势研究,国家自然科学基金青年项目(71103064),2012-2014,主持.

[7] 部省联动科技评价改革落实和负责任的同行评议试点建设.科技部委托专项项目,2021-2022,主持.

[8] 国际教育评价改革新趋势、新做法研究. 教育部委托专项项目(23JGWTO007). 2023-2023, 主持.

[9] 建立科学计量与同行评议有机结合的高校教师评价制度(基于国际案例).教育部委托专项项目,2021-2022,主持.

[10] 破除唯论文背景下高校教师科研评价体系构建.教育部委托专项项目,2021-2022,主持.

[11] “融合评价”在科技评价改革中的理论探索与实践应用.湖北省软科学重点项目,2022-2023,主持.

[12] “破四唯”背景下科技“三评”改革和同行评议规范指引应用研究.湖北省软科学重点项目,2021-2022,主持.



【本文地址】

公司简介

联系我们

今日新闻


点击排行

实验室常用的仪器、试剂和
说到实验室常用到的东西,主要就分为仪器、试剂和耗
不用再找了,全球10大实验
01、赛默飞世尔科技(热电)Thermo Fisher Scientif
三代水柜的量产巅峰T-72坦
作者:寞寒最近,西边闹腾挺大,本来小寞以为忙完这
通风柜跟实验室通风系统有
说到通风柜跟实验室通风,不少人都纠结二者到底是不
集消毒杀菌、烘干收纳为一
厨房是家里细菌较多的地方,潮湿的环境、没有完全密
实验室设备之全钢实验台如
全钢实验台是实验室家具中较为重要的家具之一,很多

推荐新闻


图片新闻

实验室药品柜的特性有哪些
实验室药品柜是实验室家具的重要组成部分之一,主要
小学科学实验中有哪些教学
计算机 计算器 一般 打孔器 打气筒 仪器车 显微镜
实验室各种仪器原理动图讲
1.紫外分光光谱UV分析原理:吸收紫外光能量,引起分
高中化学常见仪器及实验装
1、可加热仪器:2、计量仪器:(1)仪器A的名称:量
微生物操作主要设备和器具
今天盘点一下微生物操作主要设备和器具,别嫌我啰嗦
浅谈通风柜使用基本常识
 众所周知,通风柜功能中最主要的就是排气功能。在

专题文章

    CopyRight 2018-2019 实验室设备网 版权所有 win10的实时保护怎么永久关闭